Oh that nuclear program

Exclusive: US removes uranium from Iraq


I patiently await a groveling apology from the entire dextrosphere as well as the MSM and every Democrat except Joe Lieberman.

We now resume with our regularly scheduled silence.

Comments

Brian Shields said…
FTFA: "There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said."

No apologies needed.

Glad to see you posting again. Hope all is well with you and your family.
12:41 PM
Anonymous said…
come on man. If you are going to be honest then put the rest of the post up about it not being weapons grade and I believe the IAEA knowing that he had it....

not news..hardly the reason we went to war either
4:31 PM
mkfreeberg said…
It is true that this yellowcake has been locked down and (in theory) inaccessible to Saddam's regime. It's also true that this stuff is much better for us being sent to Ontario for refinement, than sitting in Iraq waiting to be stolen.

While utility grade, this stuff was plenty good enough to make dirty bombs. And 142 nuclear bombs with the proper refining facilities.

Plus, there is the other matter to consider that history didn't begin after 1991. Here we are looking at 550 pieces of evidence that Saddam was in the Uranium business. Was that so that he could benevolently provide megawatt-hours of electrical power to his struggling people? Or was he all done with trying to get his hands on more Uranium? If that is the case, why was he shopping in Niger? Did Iraq have an onion famine?
10:44 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feds eye Stevens' home remodeling project

Feds eye Stevens' home remodeling project . Thank God they're going after this guy. He's been so brazen with his porkbarreling and the whiff of corruption around him has been ripe enough to smell from here. I'd rather have a 100% democrat run Congress if they were ethical. Term limits. One term for Senate, two for the House, one for the President. Some fear that would increase the power of lobbyists. Simple, ban any former members from being lobbyists and limit lobbyists to terms as well. (I'm not sure how that would work. Just a thought.) The other answer is transparency. No earmarks without a floor vote. No spending of any kind without a floor vote. All spending committees (intelligence aside) open to the public and recorded and available on the web.
Read more

First, fourth, what's the difference?

Black Pope could follow Barack Obama's election, says US archbishop : "The election of Barack Obama as the first African-American US President could pave the way for the election of the first black Pope, according to a leading black American Catholic." Except that we've had three black Popes already. The last one was 1700 years ago. You'd think he know that. I knew we had them in the past. It took me all of .000048 seconds on Google to find that out.
Read more