Must read of the day

Steve Newton nails it. Combine this with his "Fighting the way you train-governing the way you campaign" and the man is really on a roll. He's a dose of much needed sobriety and objective assessment that usually follows when you're at a remove. Very well done.

Comments

Jeff the Baptist said…
I don't buy the whole "Republicans win because they're mean" concept that founds the "govern the way you campaign" piece.

I'm not saying that Republicans are the nice guys. That certainly wasn't the case in the middle of the Clinton Administration. But the idea that the Democrats have been high minded nice guys after 8 years of "Chimpy McHilterburton", BDS, and Congressional obstructionism surpassing anything Gengrich did is so much BS.
11:23 AM
The Last Ephor said…
Hmm...interesting. I didn't take that away from his post at all. Rather, I think, the thrust of his article is that your attitude prior to election influences the way you will behave after. Consider the French Revolution. It started out baying for blood and then became The Terror.
1:10 PM
Jeff the Baptist said…
I'd suggest that you read it again, start with the 5th through 9th paragraphs and then read the bit where Rush Limbaugh invents divisive politics towards the end.

It's bunk. The Republicans didn't come to power through divisive means in the 1990s. Newt Gengrich lead the Republicans to victory in 1994 by resurrecting the party platform using the Contract with America. CwA was not based on partisan scare tactics or hate rhetoric, but principles of government accountability that nobody really disputed. When they did start using highly divisive politics in the late 90s, they lost the '98 congressional elections badly enough that Gengrich stepped down.

That in itself is a refutation of "as you are elected so shall you govern."
3:15 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

For Gerard

 Many moons ago, I started reading blogs and shortly thereafter I started reading them.  I became discouraged because I read many writers, far more talented than me and the ease with which they elucidated the very points I wanted to make but so much more elegantly and completely that I just gave up.    Gerard of American Digest was one such writer.  His facility with prose and his ability to evoke emotion was remarkable.  I linked to him once with my nascent blog and he was kind enough to reach out to me and thank me for the link.  I literally had zero readers.  Just like now.  But that was the measure of the man.  He took the time to reach out to me and genuinely thank me for the link.   The closest I ever had to meeting the man was meeting Morgan in person.  Morgan and Gerard were friends.  They had an evident mutual respect for their respective works.   I never met Gerard, didn't know the man personally but having read his work I had a sense of the man.  He's dying now.  If
Read more

So....the autism thing

Since April is nearly over and it's autism awareness month, I suppose I should talk a bit about it. I guess the best way to start is to rehash the story of How I Got Here. My oldest was born in 1999. Healthy, happy and so on. One peculiar thing he did as an infant was to avoid eye contact. Our doctor assured us it was because he was so young and his eyesight was undeveloped and he was probably focusing on something in the background that was more interesting. Besides, babies don't recognize faces for a few months after birth. Only later did we find out that our doctor was an idiot. He was 16 mos. old when his little brother was born and he was walking and making wishes known by pulling me or my wife by the hand to whatever he wanted etc. He was fascinated with the wheels on toys. If you gave him a truck he'd turn it over and spin the wheels and smile. Only later would I find out this is a major warning sign. This was our first born and what the hell did I know?
Read more