Obama's Foreign Donors: The media averts its eyes

American Thinker commits and act of overt journalism that trumps literally anything I've read about campaign financing in memory. The post is entitled Obama's Foreign Donors: The media averts its eyes. Read the whole thing. Then print it and give a copy to everyone you see for the next 3 months.

The MSM (and certainly the partisans at DL and DW) have been very quick to cry foul when there are the faintest whiffs of impropriety (much less illegality) in McCain's donations. If only they applied the same rigor to The One. They won't, of course, because Obama is running for President of the World. He is so beloved by all that mere financing regulations should not prevent foreigners from sending their love (in the form of cash) to him. Look, these are oil company executives we're talking about. They're sophisticated foreigners who understand just how important this election is and if they're donating to Him they have to be smarter than Rethuglikkans anyway. What's the difference anyway? It's not like they're going to have any influence over Him anyway. They're not even in America! And really, who can really be expected to have influence over The Exalted One? None I tell you! None! Now we must kowtow toward Hawaii, birthplace of The Lightworker for midday prayers.

OoooooooooooooooooooBAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaMMMMMMMMAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Comments

Paul Smith Jr. said…
One thing to keep in mind is that there are a lot of Americans living overseas so these may be American citizens giving legally. I would hope someone is checking on that though.
2:31 PM
The Last Ephor said…
In some cases, it doesn't matter, they're over the limit.
4:45 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feds eye Stevens' home remodeling project

Feds eye Stevens' home remodeling project . Thank God they're going after this guy. He's been so brazen with his porkbarreling and the whiff of corruption around him has been ripe enough to smell from here. I'd rather have a 100% democrat run Congress if they were ethical. Term limits. One term for Senate, two for the House, one for the President. Some fear that would increase the power of lobbyists. Simple, ban any former members from being lobbyists and limit lobbyists to terms as well. (I'm not sure how that would work. Just a thought.) The other answer is transparency. No earmarks without a floor vote. No spending of any kind without a floor vote. All spending committees (intelligence aside) open to the public and recorded and available on the web.
Read more

First, fourth, what's the difference?

Black Pope could follow Barack Obama's election, says US archbishop : "The election of Barack Obama as the first African-American US President could pave the way for the election of the first black Pope, according to a leading black American Catholic." Except that we've had three black Popes already. The last one was 1700 years ago. You'd think he know that. I knew we had them in the past. It took me all of .000048 seconds on Google to find that out.
Read more