Feds eye Stevens' home remodeling project . Thank God they're going after this guy. He's been so brazen with his porkbarreling and the whiff of corruption around him has been ripe enough to smell from here. I'd rather have a 100% democrat run Congress if they were ethical. Term limits. One term for Senate, two for the House, one for the President. Some fear that would increase the power of lobbyists. Simple, ban any former members from being lobbyists and limit lobbyists to terms as well. (I'm not sure how that would work. Just a thought.) The other answer is transparency. No earmarks without a floor vote. No spending of any kind without a floor vote. All spending committees (intelligence aside) open to the public and recorded and available on the web.
Comments
One wonders what they would have to show in response.
It's not that they're objectifying white people, but that Obama's people are trying to show he has white support to keep him from being branded as the "black" candidate." We were in a similar siutation in 1996, when I was running the campaign of a white Republican against the first black mayor of Wilmington. We certainly made no appeals based on race, but through no fault of our own, we were stuck with a racially divided electorate. To show that we weren't appealing just to white voters (despite what the News-Journal claimed, even after we complained to them multiple times about their stating that), we made a definite effort to put our black supporters front and center. (We even held off on announcing our "Democrats for..." until we could find a black person willing to put their name as a member of the leadership team. We had plenty of black Democrat support, but many were afraid to put their name out publicly.)
That's all that Obama is trying to do here: show that he has white support, which is factually true. It's about controlling the message and images the campaign is displaying. Race is a means to that end in this case, not an end in itself and therefore not objectionable, in my opinion.