Trent Lott MUST GO. Any politician who brags at how "wily" they are vis a vis spending is not someone who deserves to be in office. That's not your job, Senator.

Anybody but Lott. Can we ride him out on the rail he wants to build?

Comments

The Last Ephor said…
Great. Get rid of all the "old boys". The Founders never intended for there to be a class of professional politicians. It's supposed to be a civic duty like jury duty. You do it once and go home. I think the people who should be elected should be the ones who want to be there least.
8:14 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feds eye Stevens' home remodeling project

Feds eye Stevens' home remodeling project . Thank God they're going after this guy. He's been so brazen with his porkbarreling and the whiff of corruption around him has been ripe enough to smell from here. I'd rather have a 100% democrat run Congress if they were ethical. Term limits. One term for Senate, two for the House, one for the President. Some fear that would increase the power of lobbyists. Simple, ban any former members from being lobbyists and limit lobbyists to terms as well. (I'm not sure how that would work. Just a thought.) The other answer is transparency. No earmarks without a floor vote. No spending of any kind without a floor vote. All spending committees (intelligence aside) open to the public and recorded and available on the web.
Read more

First, fourth, what's the difference?

Black Pope could follow Barack Obama's election, says US archbishop : "The election of Barack Obama as the first African-American US President could pave the way for the election of the first black Pope, according to a leading black American Catholic." Except that we've had three black Popes already. The last one was 1700 years ago. You'd think he know that. I knew we had them in the past. It took me all of .000048 seconds on Google to find that out.
Read more