Jihadi Leader Says Radicals Share Obama Victory

Jihadi Leader Says Radicals Share Obama Victory


The leader of a jihadi group in Iraq argued Friday that the election of Barack Obama as president represented a victory for radical Islamic groups that had battled American forces since the invasion of Iraq.
(snip)
In his address, Mr. Baghdadi also said that the election of Mr. Obama — and the rejection of the Republican candidate, Senator John McCain — was a victory for his movement, a claim that has already begun to resonate among the radical faithful.


Interesting that when Republicans were saying this liberals were getting the vapors. Baghdadi is claiming a victory that isn't his but it's telling that he thinks Obama will pull up stakes as fast as possible and leave Iraq to him and his ilk.

He later calls for a truce with the west. Something you don't do if you're winning. He's on the losing side and trying to boast about anything he can to keep the flame of bloodlust alive with his followers.

Comments

road warrior said…
It's crazy how different people are using the Obama victory for their own gain and purposes. the liberal illuminati made it clear during the election that Obama had nothing to do with any terrorists despite what the crazy conservatives were saying. But there is no doubt the terrorists were on Obamas side. I'm just not sure that's a good thing.
4:59 PM
The Last Ephor said…
I'm absolutely certain it's not a good thing
11:53 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feds eye Stevens' home remodeling project

Feds eye Stevens' home remodeling project . Thank God they're going after this guy. He's been so brazen with his porkbarreling and the whiff of corruption around him has been ripe enough to smell from here. I'd rather have a 100% democrat run Congress if they were ethical. Term limits. One term for Senate, two for the House, one for the President. Some fear that would increase the power of lobbyists. Simple, ban any former members from being lobbyists and limit lobbyists to terms as well. (I'm not sure how that would work. Just a thought.) The other answer is transparency. No earmarks without a floor vote. No spending of any kind without a floor vote. All spending committees (intelligence aside) open to the public and recorded and available on the web.
Read more

First, fourth, what's the difference?

Black Pope could follow Barack Obama's election, says US archbishop : "The election of Barack Obama as the first African-American US President could pave the way for the election of the first black Pope, according to a leading black American Catholic." Except that we've had three black Popes already. The last one was 1700 years ago. You'd think he know that. I knew we had them in the past. It took me all of .000048 seconds on Google to find that out.
Read more