Did I say 250?

And yesterday Biden let slip that he and Obama apparently have a sliding scale to determine who's "super-rich."

Obama, after all, has been promising a tax cut for the "middle class" - those making $200,000 a year or less.

Biden yesterday lowered that bar.

"What we're saying," he told a Pennsylvania TV interviewer, "is that [our] tax break doesn't need to go to people making . . . $1.4 million. It should go to [people] making under $150,000 a year."

Oops. That's a 25 percent downward redefinition of "middle class."

An Obama mouthpiece quickly dismissed the discrepancy as just another one of Joe the Senator's gaffes.

But consider: The campaign has a new TV commercial out declaring that families - not individuals - earning $200,000 or less would qualify for a tax cut. Two incomes - not one.

And, as most middle-class wage-earners know, that's a huge difference.


This is like an auction in reverse. "Do I hear 250? How about 200? 150 anyone?"

Take two people in Manhattan, Chicago or LA and tell them that together, making 200K for a family of four or even three, that they're "rich" or even "wealthy". Watch them laugh derisively.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Feds eye Stevens' home remodeling project

First, fourth, what's the difference?